The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2020, 08:30 PM   #1
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,724
Re: 6L90 refresh/rebuild?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieinNC View Post
Suggest you do a lot of research on this one before you commit...

Below you will find the ratio differences between a 6L80 and 4L80

Along with some other thoughts....

6L80/90 boxes are a totally different animal build wise from a 4L80 style...

6L80/90

Note...Notice no 1:1 in this trans
4.03
2.36 -- 58.56% (high) RPM Retention 41.44% RPM DROP
1.53 -- 64.83% (high) RPM Retention 35.17% RPM DROP
1.15 -- 75.16% (high) RPM Retention 24.84% RPM DROP
0.852 -- 74.09% (high) RPM Retention 25.91% RPM DROP
0.67/.70

4l80/85
2.48
1.48 -- 59.68% (high) RPM Retention 40.32% RPM DROP
1.00 -- 67.57% (high) RPM Retention 32.43% RPM DROP
0.75

Hope that you know that 6L's will not work with LS1 based engine.

If your going to put LS2 in front of it check with Mast Motorsports or others and make sure their ECM will work with it.

Mast Motorsports are the only one I know of that claims to have LS 2 ECM that will work with it.

Only GM's LS3/7 or 9 ECM work with it.

Thanks for the suggestions, none of the things you mentioned should be a problem. Trans is being swapped with the LSA it was originally behind along with the ECM that was in the same car. TCM already matched to ECM should not have to reprogram anything. Just disable vats, focus on tune and shift points. Not sure why people bring up the no true 1:1. It does not really matter, 1:1 or 1:15 is just another gear as far as overdrive trans are concerned. Gear spacing is better with the 6L over 4L especially at the top end. The low 1st gear will be good to get my large tires moving. With the 5.38 gearing I will be running am going to have a final drive ratio a bit lower than the stock vehicle had. Right where I want it.
So..... I have heard these transmissions are pretty reliable. Do not really want to go full aftermarket on the innards. Should I do a full rebuild?
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 09:17 AM   #2
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 6,272
Re: 6L90 refresh/rebuild?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Thanks for the suggestions, none of the things you mentioned should be a problem. Trans is being swapped with the LSA it was originally behind along with the ECM that was in the same car. TCM already matched to ECM should not have to reprogram anything. Just disable vats, focus on tune and shift points. Not sure why people bring up the no true 1:1. It does not really matter, 1:1 or 1:15 is just another gear as far as overdrive trans are concerned. Gear spacing is better with the 6L over 4L especially at the top end. The low 1st gear will be good to get my large tires moving. With the 5.38 gearing I will be running am going to have a final drive ratio a bit lower than the stock vehicle had. Right where I want it.
So..... I have heard these transmissions are pretty reliable. Do not really want to go full aftermarket on the innards. Should I do a full rebuild?
Your exactly right, no 1:1 isn’t a big deal at all. I hate the 4l80E in my 1998 K2500. My last couple company trucks have all had 6L90’s and they are a far better tranny in my opinion. The huge spacing in between the gears in the 4l80 always has you with either too much gear or not enough, especially with bigger tires. The 6l90 always seems to be able to keep the the engine in the power band. I’d still be interested in those 6l90 Camaro parts when you get to that point Richard. I’ve put over 250,000 miles across 2 different 6l90’s and have never had so much as a weak shift. It’s a strong unit, and I believe you will like it a lot.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 315/75/16's
‘87 IROC-Z all original 50K mile survivor TPI 305 IROC Blue
‘10 Camaro 2SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic #93 -version 2.0
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2020, 02:29 AM   #3
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,724
Re: 6L90 refresh/rebuild?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 57taskforce View Post
Your exactly right, no 1:1 isn’t a big deal at all. I hate the 4l80E in my 1998 K2500. My last couple company trucks have all had 6L90’s and they are a far better tranny in my opinion. The huge spacing in between the gears in the 4l80 always has you with either too much gear or not enough, especially with bigger tires. The 6l90 always seems to be able to keep the the engine in the power band. I’d still be interested in those 6l90 Camaro parts when you get to that point Richard. I’ve put over 250,000 miles across 2 different 6l90’s and have never had so much as a weak shift. It’s a strong unit, and I believe you will like it a lot.
Have a 4L80e in my 2000 C2500 work truck (OBS) Not really happy with it. Always going in and out or overdrive. Shifting horribly now, actually stalling the engine in reverse. Purchased from from my old boss and have to do a tear down to correct the rebuild from a local transmission shop. Took a crap after only 6000 miles warranty was 5000. They will not warranty it.
I generally hang on to to everything I have until it is up and running. Have not forgotten about you.
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 02:33 PM   #4
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 6,272
Re: 6L90 refresh/rebuild?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Have a 4L80e in my 2000 C2500 work truck (OBS) Not really happy with it. Always going in and out or overdrive. Shifting horribly now, actually stalling the engine in reverse. Purchased from from my old boss and have to do a tear down to correct the rebuild from a local transmission shop. Took a crap after only 6000 miles warranty was 5000. They will not warranty it.
I generally hang on to to everything I have until it is up and running. Have not forgotten about you.
I know what your mean, my K2500 is starting to stall in reverse too. It still shifts good. I guess I can’t complain too much as it has 200,000+ on it and I know for sure it’s the original transmisson. 100,000 of those have been pushing 35’s around with stock 3:73 gears. That said the 6l90 performance is superior in every way.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 315/75/16's
‘87 IROC-Z all original 50K mile survivor TPI 305 IROC Blue
‘10 Camaro 2SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic #93 -version 2.0
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com