The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2010, 10:03 PM   #1
ghinmi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Middleville, MI
Posts: 14
Frame strength

I haven't been able to find anything on here regarding frame strength. I've got the bare frame laying here and it seems fairly easy to twist. I was wondering if anyone did anything to stiffen them up? Things like welding the crossmembers in or boxing them? I will be doing a full cage so maybe I'm just being paranoid? I am looking to put around 1000 horsepower through it eventually. Any advice would be appreciated.
__________________
1983 Jeep Cherokee 2 door
LWB '71 C10 frame shortened to 110" wb, turbo HEMI powered, autocross project

1977 Jeep Wagoneer 4 door
Looks stock, 83mm Bullseye turbocharged AMC 401
ghinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2010, 11:11 PM   #2
cableguy0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,950
Re: Frame strength

At a for real legit 1000 horsepower you need to be looking at doing a full tube chassis. There arent many stock frames capable of handling that without twisting.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member.
cableguy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2010, 11:50 PM   #3
regan wilson
Senior Member
 
regan wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: tyler texas
Posts: 1,534
Re: Frame strength

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghinmi View Post
I haven't been able to find anything on here regarding frame strength. I've got the bare frame laying here and it seems fairly easy to twist. I was wondering if anyone did anything to stiffen them up? Things like welding the crossmembers in or boxing them? I will be doing a full cage so maybe I'm just being paranoid? I am looking to put around 1000 horsepower through it eventually. Any advice would be appreciated.
All it takes is a well built cage with front and rear strut bars . I've been trying to tear mine up for 31 years with no success . I havent hurt it with 1200hp.
__________________
NHRA Super Street 469C
It only runs 10.90 at 156 mph
regan wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 11:29 AM   #4
ghinmi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Middleville, MI
Posts: 14
Re: Frame strength

Quote:
Originally Posted by regan wilson View Post
All it takes is a well built cage with front and rear strut bars . I've been trying to tear mine up for 31 years with no success . I havent hurt it with 1200hp.
That's what I was hoping to hear. I didn't think it'd be a problem based on some other stuff we've built. The engine that's going in it right now is in the 550 horsepower range and I'm not so worried about that. Just thinking into the future since I'm starting from scratch.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
1983 Jeep Cherokee 2 door
LWB '71 C10 frame shortened to 110" wb, turbo HEMI powered, autocross project

1977 Jeep Wagoneer 4 door
Looks stock, 83mm Bullseye turbocharged AMC 401
ghinmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 01:36 PM   #5
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: Frame strength

People are putting 1000+ hp through 4th gen f-bods with sub frame connectors and a cage. I'm sure they would pretzel up before one of these truck frames with a cage attached to it.
__________________
------Motor---------------Bottle
60'---1.53---------------1.41
1/8---6.58 @ 105.92----5.87 @ 118.41
1/4---10.38 @ 126.97----9.24 @ 142.49
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 11:43 AM   #6
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,261
Re: Frame strength

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghinmi View Post
I haven't been able to find anything on here regarding frame strength. I've got the bare frame laying here and it seems fairly easy to twist. I was wondering if anyone did anything to stiffen them up? Things like welding the crossmembers in or boxing them? I will be doing a full cage so maybe I'm just being paranoid? I am looking to put around 1000 horsepower through it eventually. Any advice would be appreciated.
Our frames are actually pretty strong with all of the integral sheetmetal attached. Assuming you'll be making upwards of 800 ft-lb, or more, of torque with your 1000 hp engine combination, I would think about a roll cage that included forward bars to the front part of the frame, as well as rearward bars from the main hoop, landing at the rear of the frame. I recently boxed the frame of my '63 and added forward bars with a front motor plate attachment accommodate the added torque of my new Pontiac engine combo, but I'm only making 525 hp/600 ft-lb.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes

Last edited by vin63; 11-29-2010 at 11:43 AM.
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 12:45 PM   #7
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,163
Re: Frame strength

Quote:
Originally Posted by vin63 View Post
[COLOR="Navy"]Our frames are actually pretty strong with all of the integral sheetmetal attached.
Agree - a truck frame is WAY stronger than a passenger car frame.

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 09:22 PM   #8
Irish's_79_Step
Registered User
 
Irish's_79_Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 122
Re: Frame strength

I have a 73 short Stepside. i thoguht the same thing so i boxed out a little over half the frame almost to the trans cross member. after getting about 2 feet boxed on both sides i had almost no flex in the frame. from trying to twist it with my hands. i plan on having a full cage put in after i get it back together. also planning on around 1k HP. Just my two cents.
Irish's_79_Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2010, 05:26 PM   #9
kpeztruck
Registered User
 
kpeztruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 229
Re: Frame strength

I welded some of the crossmembers to top and bottom of frame. I am not sure if it was nesc., I was just paranoid. Installed 12 point cage with funnycar cage. Certified to 7.50 with NHRA. I put well over 1000 hp through mine with stock suspension, and have not had any problems yet. Enjoy it, it's a blast to bust off mid-five second runs in the 1/8, and see people's faces after each run. This truck got more people stopping by in the pits after one pass, than our index car has gotten in 4 years! Paul Baxter
kpeztruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 03:35 AM   #10
darthwall
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 274
Re: Frame strength

im not 100% sure but. you look at a truck frame and look at a nova/camaro frame and there is none then look at the chevelle and cutless frame?
darthwall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 03:07 PM   #11
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,261
Re: Frame strength

Quote:
Originally Posted by darthwall View Post
im not 100% sure but. you look at a truck frame and look at a nova/camaro frame and there is none then look at the chevelle and cutless frame?
This is true, the X-bodies utilize a subframe configuration, while the A-bodies had a full frame with a rocker kick out design.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com